{short description of image}

Novartis Foundation Bulletin

Issue 12, October 2002

ban2bull.gif (2140 bytes)

ban2who.gif (2083 bytes)

ban2arch2.gif (1965 bytes)

ban2hist.gif (1951 bytes)

ban2cont.gif (2061 bytes)

ban2home.gif (1881 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Welcome to the 12th edition of the Novartis Foundation's Bulletin.

This issue features reports on: 


News from the Foundation 


(Based on presentations given at Novartis Foundation Symposium 252 'Generation and effector functions of regulatory lymphocytes' held in London on 9-11 July 2002)

Crackdown on persistent infections imminent

Crafty pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, HIV and Trypanosoma gondii cause chronic, often deadly infections by hoodwinking their host's immune surveillance. But at a Novartis Foundation Symposium recently held in London, scientists declared it soon may be possible to manipulate the immune system to eliminate these infectious agents for good. Their main target is a type of lymphocyte known as a 'T suppressor' or 'T regulatory' cell that is currently causing a furore in immunological circles.

These suppressor cells are not exactly newcomers. Their existence was proposed more than 30 years ago, but it was only in 1995 that Shimon Sakaguchi (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan) showed they were a distinct lineage of CD4+ T cells with a common marker on their surface: CD25. Since then, the excitement surrounding these cells has been mounting. 

Normally, regulatory lymphocytes are involved in the laudable task of suppressing autoreactive cells that cause autoimmune disease. But in chronic infections, these immunosuppressive T cells may actually be helping the pathogens to avoid detection. Kim Hasenkrug (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Hamilton, MT, USA) points out that "these microorganisms may be using T suppressor cells as a window of escape." 

To investigate ways to eliminate chronic infection, Hasenkrug has focused his studies on mice persistently infected with Friend leukaemia virus. These animals are clearly immunosuppressed: their CD4+CD25+ T cells shoot up to twice the normal percentage, and they are unable to reject transplanted tumours. 

"Once the virus establishes persistence it is hard to get rid of," he admits. However, injecting antibodies that block TGFb and IL-10 receptors—molecules thought to be key in suppression—has been a success. The numbers of suppressor cells fall and the mice regain their capacity to reject tumours. "This is a feasible treatment approach for virus-induced immunosuppression; it is very short but with long term effects," he enthuses.

There are a number of persistent infections where immunosuppressive T cells have been detected; for instance, infections with Borrelia burgdorferi (the causative agent of Lyme disease), Bordetella pertussis, Schistosomiasis mansoni and in infections with human immunodeficiency and hepatitis C viruses. 

Skin infections with the parasite Leishmania major, also reveal an abundance of CD4+CD25+ cells. "It's a beautiful system," remarks Ethan Shevach (NIAID Laboratory of Immunology, Bethesda, MD, USA). "After you infect the ear, the number of parasites plummets and you are left with 6000 parasites that live happily ever after." 

At the healed site of infection, there is also an abundance of immunosuppressive T cells. "Half of these are CD4+CD25+ cells," says Shevach. "They are contributing to the survival and proliferation of the parasites by suppressing and killing Leishmania-specific effector T cells." These effector lymphocytes would normally clear the parasite but they are kept back by the regulatory lymphocytes. In the chronically infected skin, suppressor and effector T cells are engaged in a delicate balancing act. 

To eliminate parasites or other persistent infections, one solution is to expand T effector cells. Vaccines have the potential to do this but the response is often too weak. "It would be great to get rid of CD4+CD25+ cells, at least transiently, for vaccination purposes," Shevach concludes. No doubt immunologists already have some options up their sleeves.

Dr Lisa MeltonScience writer, Novartis Foundation, London

(top)

This article was published in the Lancet Infectious Diseases 2:514, September 2002

'Generation and effector functions of regulatory lymphocytes' is due to be published by John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK in April 2003


(Based on presentations given at Novartis Foundation Symposium 251 'Autism: neural basis and treatment possibilities' held in London on 18-20 June 2002)

What's in a face?

What does a face mean to you? How easily can you recognize fear when you see it? Scientists have pinpointed certain areas of the brain involved in face recognition and fear recognition through neurological research. People with autism have a specific deficit in face recognition and they find it difficult to recognize expressions of emotion. Brain scans in normal individuals show that an area the size of a broad bean, within the fusiform gyrus at the back of the brain, is activated during face recognition. This so-called fusiform face area (FFA), points out Rob Schultz (Yale University Child Study Center), is not activated in individuals with autism when they see faces. Neural activation in these people is observed in a different region normally associated with object recognition.

This led Chris Frith (Wellcome Department of Imaging Science), at a recent Novartis Foundation Symposium on autism, to raise the question, which Schultz had dealt with in an earlier publication, as to whether people with autism might be treating faces as objects. The answer is clouded by the fact that in normal individuals the FFA is activated in response to seeing certain objects. This might be the case for a camera lover when he sees his favourite lens. Perhaps faces are not as interesting for individuals with autism as they are for normal people.

In light of findings suggesting that the FFA is not selective for faces, Schultz proposes that persons with autistic spectrum disorders are less socially motivated and therefore disinterested in the face. He believes that an expertise for face processing develops gradually in normal socially motivated individuals possibly through interactions between the FFA and the amygdala. Recent studies indicate that the amygdala plays an
important role in processing facial expressions in collaboration with
other brain regions.

The amygdala of autistic individuals is abnormal. It has been shown that the human amygdala (situated near the fusiform gyrus) is engaged in processing fearful expressions on faces. David Amaral (UC Davis Center for Neuroscience) has studied monkeys with damage to the amygdala. These monkeys were curiously unafraid of frightening stimuli including snakes but appeared to be capable of normal social interaction. Hitherto it had been proposed that abnormal amygdalas in people with autism were associated with altered social functioning. However, Amaral advises that "If the amygdala is pathological in subjects with autism, it may contribute to their abnormal fears and increased anxiety rather than their abnormal social behaviour".

Individuals with Turner's syndrome are females and, like males, have a substantially higher rate of autistic-like conditions than normal females; most notably Turner's females have enlarged amygdalas. Turner's females have only one X-chromosome unlike their normal female counterparts who have two Xs, one from each parent. In order to explain why males are statistically at least 4 times more likely to suffer from autistic spectrum disorders, David Skuse (Institute of Child Health, London) argues that one or more X-linked genetic loci are associated with the expression of autistic characteristics. Two different genetic mechanisms could explain male vulnerability. First, males (like
Turner's females) have a single X-chromosome, therefore a lower level of X-linked product for any gene that is needed in two copies in normal females.

Second, males (whose single X-chromosome is always inherited from their mothers) may lack expression of an imprinted X-linked gene, which is active only if inherited from the father (as in normal females). Both putative mechanisms could provide protection from autism for females by increasing the threshold at which other autism-predisposing genes influence behaviour and cognition. This explanation for male vulnerability is plausible despite the fact that genome wide screens haven't revealed strong X-linkage to autism. Skuse points out that "a complex multiallelic pattern of vulnerability would be necessary for phenotypic expression". To date, linkage studies have had insufficient power to detect this.

With a limited success in drug treatment and/or intervention studies there is a greater need for genetic predictors and understanding of the pathology of autism. However, as alluded to above, this will not necessarily result from genome-wide screens until we understand how genes interact with one another and how post-translational modifications (like methylation) impact on the phenotype. There is a very large picture to complete before we approach a full understanding of the aetiology and therefore potentially successful treatment of autistic spectrum disorders. Francesca Happé (Institute of Psychiatry, London) feels that given the complexity of such disorders, it would be more profitable to search for the biological basis of the characteristic social and non-social deficits rather than the aetiology of autism per se. It would certainly be interesting to pinpoint the genes associated with neural development, specifically the development of the fusiform face area and the amygdala in relation to this spectrum of disorders.

Brona McVittieAssistant Science Editor, Novartis Foundation, London

(top)

'
Autism: neural basis and treatment possibilities' is due to be published by John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK in March 2003


(Based on presentations given at Novartis Foundation Symposium 251 'Autism: neural basis and treatment possibilities' held in London on 18-20 June 2002)

Bursar's report

The opportunity to attend the three-day-symposium on Autism: neural basis and treatment possibilities symposium chaired by Sir Michael Rutter, and attended by a select group of world leaders in the area, constituted the highlight of my research career to date. In addition to this great opportunity, the Novartis Foundation funded a six week study tour enabling me to spend time at Cambridge University, the Institute of Psychiatry, and the University of Oxford. 

The first leg of my bursary period at Cambridge University (Centre for Autism Research) was spent with Dr. Patrick Bolton, a leader in the field of the genetics, neurobiology, and psychiatry of child developmental disorders. Dr. Bolton arranged for me to spend time discussing contemporary research and clinical issues with his large research team of epidemiologists, psychiatrists, and experimental psychologists. I had read much of the ground breaking research to emerge from Cambridge over the last decade. However, being able to discuss methodologies, theoretical development of key issues, and future directions for autism research in detail was an invaluable and exciting experience. At the end of my two-weeks at Cambridge, I left having made key contacts with fellow researchers, who in addition to sharing their intellect, went out of their way to show me their beautiful university town, arranging tours of the colleges, punting, and of course a pint in the famous Cambridge Pub where Watson & Crick's pioneering contribution to the discovery of DNA took place. 

For the second part of my bursary period I was hosted by Dr. Francesca Happe at the Institute of Psychiatry (Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre). This was a particular highlight for me, as I have based much of my own research on Dr. Happe's cutting-edge 'central coherence' theories of autism. I had the opportunity to present my own research work at the Institute and receive valuable feedback from Dr. Happe and her research colleagues. Dr. Happe's passion and drive to understand the cognitive underpinnings of autism was inspirational. 

The last two-weeks of my bursary period were spent with Professor Dorothy Bishop at the University of Oxford (Department of Experimental Psychology). Professor Bishop is a world leader in childhood language disorders, and has made a huge contribution to our understanding of language delays and deficits in children with autism. Through my discussions with Professor Bishop, I was inspired to 'think outside the square' about my research and directed to look more closely at the interplay between the cognitive, motor, and language features of autism. It was an honour to be able to discuss and share ideas with a scholar as eminent as Professor Bishop. 

I am indebted to the Novartis Bursary hosts for their enthusiastic encouragement of my current research and future research plans. Since returning to Australia, I have remained in contact with my newly acquainted research colleagues, and look forward to catching up with them again in person during the Autism World Congress which will be held in Melbourne later this year [see http://www.autismcongress.com]. 

Dr. Nicole J. RinehartDepartment of Psychology, Monash University, Australia

(top)


The Novartis Foundation bursary scheme 

The aim of the bursary scheme is to fund young scientists to attend Novartis Foundation Symposia and subsequently spend up to 12 weeks in the department of one of the symposium participants. Applicants (of any nationality) must be aged between 23-35 years on the closing date for application. They must be actively engaged in research on the topic covered by the symposium and should not already have accepted an invitation to participate in that symposium.

For details of the bursary scheme and forthcoming bursaries see:
http://www.novartisfound.org.uk/bursary.htm 
or contact the bursary scheme administrator:
E-mail: bursary@novartisfound.org.uk 


News from the Foundation

Meetings

Open meetings:
The next Novartis Foundation Open meeting is on 'Novel chemotherapeutic strategies in cancer treatment' will take place on 15 November 2002 at Scientific Societies' Lecture Theatre, New Burlington Place, London W1

To book your place at the meeting please contact Stanley Langer at the Royal Society of Chemistry, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BA by 8 November 2002
tel: +44 (0) 20 7440 3325
fax: +44 (0) 20 7734 1227
Email: langers@rsc.org

Other forthcoming meetings include:

  • Anaphylaxis, Friday 28 February 2003

  • Mammalian TRP channels as molecular targets, Friday 28 March 2003

  • Reversible acetylation of chromatin and non-histone proteins: biology and relevance to human disease, Friday 9 May 2002

To book your place at these meetings please contact the open meetings organizer
tel: +44 (0) 20 7636 9456
fax: +44 (0) 20 7436 2840
Email: openmtg@novartisfound.org.uk

Full details of Novartis Foundation Open Meetings can be found at:
http://www.novartisfound.org.uk/open.htm

Symposia:
The most recent symposium took place in Baltimore 21-23 Oct 2002 entitled 'Retinal dystrophies: functional genomics to gene therapy'. Chaired by Shomi Bhattacharya

Discussion meetings:
The next discussion meetings to take place are:

  • 31 Oct/1 Nov 2002: The biophsychosocial model within medicine: luxury or necessity? (in collaboration with One Health)

  • 15 Nov 2002: Self-assembled nanostructures in physics, chemistry and biology (in collaboration with the Royal Society)

  • 6 Dec 2002: Transgene flow in flowering plants (in collaboration with the Royal Society)

  • 21 Feb 2003: Epigenesis versus preformation in mammalian development (in collaboration with the Royal Society)

Publications
We are pleased to announce the imminent publication of:

'In silico' simulation of biological processes
(Novartis Foundation Symposium 247)
http://www.novartisfound.org.uk/nbook.htm#247
and
Mucus hypersecretion in respiratory disease
(Novartis Foundation Symposium 248)
http://www.novartisfound.org.uk/nbook.htm#248

For details of other publications see: http://www.novartisfound.org.uk/nbook.htm

Book sale 2002
Many of our out-of-print symposium volumes are available at vastly reduced prices in this year's book sale.
Please see: http://www.novartisfound.org.uk/booksale.htm
for details and how to order or email: bulletin@novartisfound.org.uk

Publicity
Resident science writer, Dr Lisa Melton has recently published the following: 
'Immunotherapy comes in from the cold' in The Lancet 360:697, 31 August 2002
'Crackdown on persistant infections imminent' in The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2:514, September 2002
'How to conquer incontinence' in The Times T2, p 14-15, 17 September 2002

Hospitality
Details of all conference facilities and accommodation available at the Foundation can be found at: http://www.novartisfound.org.uk/hosp.htm

Personalia
The Foundation would like to congratulate Kurt Wüthrich who was recently awarded the Nobel Prize for Chemistry 2002, along with John B. Fenn and Koichi Tanaka. Professor Wüthrich received the award for his development of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for determining the three-dimensional structure of biological macromolecules in solution.
The Foundation welcomes Dr Panjab Singh, Director General of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Dehli, as joint scientific advisor for India.
Full details of personalia and activities at the Novartis Foundation can also be found in the Foundation's 2002 Annual Report and Handbook.
If you would like to receive a copy of the handbook, please send an email including postal details to: bulletin@novartisfound.org.uk

(back to top)

Last updated on 28  October 2002
The Novartis Foundation is a registered charity no. 313574